Аннотация
В обзоре представлена информация о неинвазивной респираторной терапии новорожденных, об ее преимуществах перед традиционной искусственной вентиляцией легких, дана сравнительная характеристика неинвазивной дыхательной поддержки и СРАР (continuous positive airway pressure (англ.) – постоянное положительное давление в дыхательных путях). Особое внимание уделено способам синхронизации неинвазивной респираторной терапии с пациентом, подчеркнута важность и прогностическая значимость применения синхронизированных режимов неинвазивной дыхательной поддержки. Отдельный акцент сделан на внедрение в мировую неонатальную практику неинвазивной высокочастотной вентиляции легких. Приведены клинические примеры в качестве демонстрации собственного опыта выполнения неинвазивной искусственной вентиляции легких. Уделено внимание влиянию неинвазивной дыхательной поддержки на гемодинамику у недоношенных новорожденных.
Литература
1. Мостовой А.В., Карпова А.Л. Применение СРАР-терапии в неонатологии: от простого к сложному. Детские болезни сердца и сосудов. 2015; 4: 13–23 / Mostovoy A.V., Karpova A.L. Use of CPAP therapy in neonatology: from sim- ple to complex. Detskie bolezni serdtsa i sosudov. 2015; 4: 13–23 (in Russian).
2. Llewellyn M.A., Tilak K.S., Swyer P.R. A controlled trial of assisted ventilation using an oro-nasal mask. Arch. Dis. Child. 1970; 45 (242): 453–9.
3. Gregory G.A., Kitterman J.A., Phibbs R.H., Tooley W.H., Hamilton W.K. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory-dis- tress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N. Engl. J. Med. 1971; 284 (24): 1333–40.
4. Kamper J., Baekgaard P., Peitersen B., Christiansen P.M., Tygstrup I., Friis-Hansen B. [Treatment of respiratory distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure]. Ugeskr. Laeger. 1973; 135 (41): 2207–11.
5. Allen L.P., Blake A.M., Durbin G.M., Ingram D., Reynolds E.O., Wimberley P.D. Continuous positive airway pressure and mechanical ventilation by facemask in newborn infants. Br. Med. J. 1975; 4 (5989): 137–9.
6. Pape K.E., Armstrong D.L., Fitzhardinge P.M. Central nervous system pathology associated with mask ventilation in the very low birthweight infant: a new etiology for intracerebellar hem- orrhages. Pediatrics. 1976; 58 (4): 473–83.
7. Garland J.S., Nelson D.B., Rice T., Neu J. Increased risk of gastrointestinal perforations in neonates mechanically venti- lated with either face mask or nasal prongs. Pediatrics. 1985; 76 (3): 406–10.
8. Owen L.S., Morley C.J., Davis P.G. Neonatal nasal intermit- tent positive pressure ventilation: a survey of practice in England. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal. Neonatal. Ed. 2008; 93 (2): F148–50.
9. Laptook A.R., O’Shea T.M., Shankaran S., Bhaskar B. NICHD Neonatal Network. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely low birth weight infants with a normal head ultrasound: prevalence and antecedents. Pediatrics. 2005; 115 (3): 673–80.
10. Dani C., Bresci C., Lista G., Martano C., Messina F., Migliori C., Vento G. Neonatal respiratory support strategies in the inten- sive care unit: an Italian survey. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2013; 172 (3): 331–6.
11. Мостовой А.В. Состояние проблемы выхаживания недо- ношенных новорожденных в России сегодня: результаты опроса врачей неонатологов. Акушерство и гинеколо- гия. 2013; 7: 72–9 / Mostovoy A.V. State of the problem nursing of premature newborn in Russia today: survey results of neonatologists. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2013; 7: 72–9 (in Russian).
12. De Paoli A.G., Davis P.G., Faber B., Morley C.J. Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous posi- tive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2008; 1: CD002977.
13. Mahmoud R.A., Roehr C.C., Schmalisch G. Current methods of non-invasive ventilatory support for neonates. Paediatr. Respirat. Rev. 2011; 12: 196–205.
14. Davis P.G., Morley C.J., Owen L.S. Non-invasive respiratory support of preterm neonates with respiratory distress: contin- uous positive airway pressure and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Semin. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2009; 14 (1): 14–20.
15. Moretti C., Gizzi C., Papoff P., Lampariello S., Capoferri M., Calcagnini G., Bucci G. Comparing the effects of nasal syn- chronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) after extubation in very low birth weight infants. Early Hum. Dev. 1999; 56 (2–3): 167–77.
16. Ryan C.A., Finer N.N., Peters K.L. Nasal intermittent positive- pressure ventilation offers no advantages over nasal continuous positive airway pressure in apnea of prematurity. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1989; 143 (10): 1196–8.
17. Courtney S.E., Barrington K.J. Continuous positive airway
pressure and noninvasive ventilation. Clin. Perinatol. 2007; 34
(1): 73–92.
18. Chang H.Y., Claure N., D’ugard C., Torres J., Nwajei P.,
Bancalari E. Effects of synchronization during nasal ventila- tion in clinically stable preterm infants. Pediatr. Res. 2011; 69 (1): 84–9.
19. Migliori C., Motta M., Angeli A., Chirico G. Nasal bilevel vs. continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2005; 40 (5): 426–30.
20. Kiciman N.M., Andréasson B., Bernstein G., Mannino F.L., Rich W., Henderson C., Heldt G.P. Thoracoabdominal motion in newborns during ventilation delivered by endotra- cheal tube or nasal prongs. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 1998; 25 (3): 175–81.
21. Aghai Z.H., Saslow J.G., Nakhla T., Milcarek B., Hart J., Lawrysh-Plunkett R., Stahl G., Habib R.H., Pyon K.H. Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) decreases work of breathing (WOB) in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2006; 41 (9): 875–81.
22. Hird M.F., Greenough A. Comparison of triggering systems for neonatal patient triggered ventilation. Arch. Dis. Child. 1991; 66 (4 Spec No): 426–8.
23. John J., Björklund L.J., Svenningsen N.W., Jonson B. Airway and body surface sensors for triggering in neonatal ventilation. Acta Paediatr. 1994; 83 (9): 903–9.
24. Lin C.H., Wang S.T., Lin Y.J., Yeh T.F. Efficacy of nasal inter- mittent positive pressure ventilation in treating apnea of pre- maturity. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 1998; 26 (5): 349–53.
25. Jarreau P.H., Moriette G., Mussat P., Mariette C., Mohanna A., Harf A., Lorino H. Patient-triggered ventilation decreases the work of breathing in neonates. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1996; 153 (3): 1176–81.
26. Ali N., Claure N., Alegria X., D’Ugard C., Organero R., Bancalari E. Effects of non-invasive pressure support ventila- tion (NI-PSV) on ventilation and respiratory effort in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2007; 42 (8): 704–10.
27. Lemyre B., Davis P.G., De Paoli A.G., Kirpalani H. Nasal inter- mittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal con- tinuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 9: CD003212. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD003212. pub2. PubMed PMID: 25188554.
28. Bhandari V., Gavino R.G., Nedrelow J.H. et al. A randomized controlled trial of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in RDS. J. Perinatal. 2007; 27: 697–703.
29. Bisceglia M., Belcastro A., Poerio V. et al. A comparison of nasal intermittent versus continuous positive pressure delivery for the treatment of moderate respiratory syndrome in preterm infants. Minerva Pediatr. 2007; 59: 91–5.
30. Kugelman A., Feferkorn I., Riskin A., Chistyakov I., Kauf- man B., Bader D. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respirato- ry distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study. J. Pediatr. 2007; 150 (5): 521–6, 526.e1.
31. Barrington K.J., Bull D., Finer N.N. Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2001; 107 (4): 638–41.
32. Friedlich P., Lecart C., Posen R., Ramicone E., Chan L., Ramanathan R. A randomized trial of nasopharyngeal-syn- chronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasopha- ryngeal continuous positive airway pressure in very low birth weight infants after extubation. J. Perinatol. 1999; 19 (6): 413–8.
33. Santin R., Brodsky N., Bhandari V. A prospective observa- tional pilot study of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) as a primary mode of ventilation in infants > or = 28 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). J. Perinatol. 2004; 24 (8): 487–93.
34. Khalaf M.N., Brodsky N., Hurley J., Bhandari V. A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continu- ous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics. 2001; 108 (1): 13–7.
35. Verder H., Robertson B., Greisen G. et al. Surfactant therapy and nasal continuous positive airway pressure for newborns with respiratory distress syndrome. Danish-Swedish multicen- tre study group. N. Engl. J. Med. 1994; 331: 1051–5.
36. Clark R.H. High-frequency ventilation. J. Pediatr. 1994; 124: 661–70.
37. Van der Hoeven М., Brouwer Е., Blanco С.Е. Nasal high fre- quency ventilation in neonates with moderate respiratory insufficiency. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal. Neonatal. Ed. 1998; 79: F61–3.
38. Aktas S., Unal S., Aksu M., Ozcan E., Ergenekon E., Turkyilmaz C., Hirfanoglu I., Atalay Y. Nasal HFOV with Binasal Cannula Appears Effective and Feasible in ELBW Newborns. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2015. Pii: fmv088. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 26710797.
39. Fischer H.S., Bohlin K., Bührer C., Schmalisch G., Cremer M., Reiss I., Czernik C. Nasal high-frequency oscillation ventilation in neonates: a survey in five European countries. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2015; 174 (4): 465–71.
40. De Luca D., Piastra M., Pietrini D., Conti G. Effect of ampli- tude and inspiratory time in a bench model of non-invasive HFOV through nasal prongs. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2012; 47 (10): 1012–8. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.22511. PubMed PMID: 22328295.
41. Chang H.Y., Cheng K.S., Lung H.L., Li S.T., Lin C.Y., Lee H.C., Lee C.H., Hung H.F. Hemodynamic effects of nasal intermit- tent positive pressure ventilation in preterm infants. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95 (6): e2780.
Об авторах
Мостовой Алексей Валерьевич, канд. мед. наук, ассистент, неонатолог, анестезиолог- реаниматолог, e-mail:
info@neonatalspb.ru;
Карпова Анна Львовна, канд. мед. наук, ассистент, неонатолог, анестезиолог-реаниматолог