References
1. Adappa R., Paranjothy S., Roberts Z., Cartlidge P.H.T. Perinatal
and infant autopsy. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal. Neonatal Ed. 2007;
92 (1): 49–50.
https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.091447.
2. Gordijn S.J., Erwich J.J.H.M., Khong T.Y. The perinatal autopsy:
pertinent issues in multicultural Western Europe. Eur. J.
Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2007; 132 (1): 3–7. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.10.031.
3. Shojania K.G., Burton E.C. The vanishing nonforensic autopsy.
N. Engl. J. Med. 2008; 358 (9): 873–5.
https://doi.org/
10.1056/NEJMp0707996.
4. Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T., van Rijn R.R. Current techniques
in postmortem imaging with specific attention to paediatric
applications. Pediatr. Radiol. 2010; 40 (2): 141–52. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1486-0.
5. Rispler-Chaim V. The ethics of postmortem examinations in
contemporary Islam. J. Med. Ethics. 1993; 19 (3): 164–8.
6. Mohammed M., Kharoshah M.A. Autopsy in Islam and current
practice in Arab Muslim countries. J. Forensic. Leg. Med.
2014; 23: 80–3.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.02.005.
7. Burton E.C., Gurevitz S.A., Collins K.A. Religions and
the autopsy. 2012. Available at:
http://emedicine.
medscape.com/article/1705993-overview (дата обращения
15.01.2017 / accessed 15 January 2017).
8. Levin J. Jewish ethical themes that should inform the national
healthcare discussion: a prolegomenon. J. Relig. Health.
2012; 51 (3): 589–600.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-
012-9617-6.
9. Мустафин Т.И., Хасанов Р.Р. Актуальные вопросы патоло-
гоанатомических исследований и малотравматичные тех-
нологии при аутопсии. Медицинский вестник Башкор-
тостана. 2007; 2 (1): 47–50 [Mustafin T.I., Khasanov R.R.
The problems of postmortem studies and minhnvasive technology
in autopsy. Meditsinskiy Vestnik Bashkortostana
(Medical Bulletin of Bashkortostan). 2007; 2 (1): 47–50
(in Russ.).]
10. Туманова Е.Л., Жакота Д.А., Корчагина Н.С., Ворожбие-
ва Т.Э., Глашкина С.А. Перинатальные патологоанатомиче-
ские исследования: значение в организации перинаталь-
ной помощи и перспективы развития (обзор литературы).
Вестник Росздравнадзора. 2016; 3: 34–7 [Tumanova E.L.,
Zhakota D.A., Korchagina N.S., Vorozhbieva T.E., Glashkina
S.A. Perinatal autopsies: value in the perinatal care and prospects
of evolution (review). Vestnik Roszdravnadzora (Bulletin
of Roszdravnadzor, Russian journal). 2016; 3: 34–7 (in Russ.).]
11. Arthurs O.J., Taylor A.M., Sebire N.J. Indications, advantages
and limitations of perinatal postmortem imaging in clinical
practice. Pediatr Radiol. 2015; 45 (4): 491–500. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3165-z.
12. Harjeet K., Sahni D., Batra Y.K., Rajeev S. Anatomical dimensions
of trachea, main bronchi, subcarinal and bronchial
angles in fetuses measured ex vivo. Paediatr. Anaesth. 2008;
18 (11): 1029–34.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.
2008.02775.x.
13. Gilbert-Barness E. (ed.) Potter's pathology of the fetus, infant
and child. 2nd ed. Salt Lake City: Mosby; 2007: 2444.
14. Cox J.A., Lukande R.L., Kalungi S., Van de Vijver K., Van
Marck E., Nelson A.M. et al. Practice of percutaneous needle
autopsy; a descriptive study reporting experiences from
Uganda. BMC Clin. Pathol. 2014; 14 (1): 44.
https://doi.org/
10.1186/1472-6890-14-44.
15. Foroudi F., Cheung K., Duflou J. A comparison of the needle
biopsy post-mortem with the conventional autopsy.
Pathology. 1995; 27 (1): 79–81.
16. Garg S., Punia R.P.S., Basu S., Mohan H., Bal A. Comparison
of needle autopsy with conventional autopsy in neonates.
Fetal. Pediatr. Pathol. 2009; 28 (3): 139–50.
17. Vester M.E.M., van Rijn R.R. A knot in the gut: A paediatric
post-mortem CT diagnosis. J. Forensic Radiol. Imaging.
2015; 3 (4): 238–40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2015.
05.005.
18. Morgan M.A., D'Souza D. Portal venous gas. Available at:
http://radiopaedia.org/articles/portal-venous-gas (дата об-
ращения 15.01.2017 / accessed 15 January 2017).
19. Woźniak K.J., Moskała A., Kluza P., Romaszko K., Lopatin O.,
Rzepecka-Woźniak E. Whole-body post-mortem computed
tomography angiography of a newborn revealing transposition
of great arteries. Int. J. Legal. Med. 2015; 129 (6): 1253–8.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1267-2.
20. Vaneckova M., Seidl Z., Goldova B., Vitkova I., Baxova A.,
Calda P. Meningocerebral angiodysplasia: post-mortem magnetic
resonance imaging and autopsy. A case report.
Neuroradiol J. 2009; 22 (4): 435–8.
21. Roberts I.S.D., Traill Z.C. Minimally invasive autopsy employing
post-mortem CT and targeted coronary angiography:
Evaluation of its application to a routine Coronial service.
Histopathology. 2014; 64 (2): 211–7.
https://doi.org/10.
1111/his.12271.
22. Rutty G., Saunders S., Morgan B., Raj V. Targeted cardiac postmortem
computed tomography angiography: A pictorial
review. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2012; 8: 40–7.
23. Туманова У.Н., Федосеева В.К., Ляпин В.М., Быченко В.Г.,
Воеводин С.М., Щеголев А.И. Плод-акардиус: посмертная
компьютерная и магнитно-резонансная томография.
Диагностическая и интервенционная радиология.
2016; 10 (2): 23–30 [Tumanova U.N., Fedoseeva V.K.,
Lyapin V.M., Bychenko V.G., Voevodin S.M., Shchegolev A.I.
Acardiac fetus: post-mortem computed and magnetic resonance
tomography imaging. Diagnosticheskaya i Interventsionnaya
Radiologiya (Diagnostic and Interventional
Radiology, Russian journal). 2016; 10 (2): 23–30 (in Russ.).]
24. Lombardi C.M., Zambelli V., Botta G., Moltrasio F., Cattoretti
G., Lucchini V. et al. Post-mortem microcomputed tomography
(micro-CT) of small fetuses and hearts. Ultrasound
Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 44 (5): 600–9.
https://doi.org/
10.1002/uog.13330.
25. Thayyil S., Sebire N.J., Chitty L.S., Wade A., Chong W.,
Olsen O. et al. Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy
in fetuses and children: A prospective validation study. Lancet.
2013; 382: 223–33.
26. Breeze A.C.G., Cross J.J., Hackett G.A., Jessop F.A., Joubert
I., Lomas D.J. et al. Use of a confidence scale in reporting
post-mortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound
Obstet. Gynecol. 2006; 28 (7): 918–24.
https://doi.org/
10.1002/uog.3886.
27. Weustink A.C., Hunink M.G.M., van Dijke C.F., Renken N.S.,
Krestin G.P., Oosterhuis J.W. Minimally invasive autopsy: an
alternative to conventional autopsy? Radiology. 2009;
250 (3): 897–904.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.
2503080421.
28. Damore L.J., Barth R.F., Morrison C.D., Frankel W.L., Melvin
W.S. Laparoscopic post-mortem examination: a minimally
invasive approach to the autopsy. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 2000;
4 (2): 95–8.
https://doi.org/10.1053/adpa.2000.0095.
29. Fan J.K.M., Tong D.K.H., Poon J.T.C., Lo O.S.H., Beh P.S.L.,
Patil N.G. et al. Multimodality minimally invasive autopsy –
a feasible and accurate approach to post-mortem examination.
Forensic Sci. Int. 2010; 195 (1–3): 93–8.
https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.11.019.
30. Sebire N.J., Weber M.A., Thayyil S., Mushtaq I., Taylor A.,
Chitty L.S. Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic
resonance imaging and endoscopic post-mortem examination
(“keyhole autopsy”): feasibility and initial experience.
J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2012; 25 (5): 513–8.
https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2011.601368.
31. Asamura H., Shiozaki T., Sato N., Hayashi T. Trial investigation
of post-mortem non-invasive transnasal endoscopy. Forensic
Sci. Int. 2012; 220 (1–3): 184–90.
https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.forsciint.2012.02.023.
32. Tsujinaka M., Akaza K., Nagai A., Nakamura I., Bunai Y.
Usefulness of post-mortem ophthalmological endoscopy
during forensic autopsy: a case report. Med. Sci. Law. 2005;
45 (1): 85–8.
33. Roberts I.S.D., Benbow E.W., Bisset R., Jenkins J.P.R.,
Lee S.H., Reid H. et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging
in determining cause of sudden death in adults: comparison
with conventional autopsy. Histopathology. 2003; 42 (5):
424–30.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2559.2003.01614.x.